A question for scientifically based-atheists from an agnostic...?

I would consider my own views closer to athiesm than mono/polyethism, as the concept of organized religion is a paradox in my view. I know you base your belief on the fact that there is no scientific evidence of a 'God,' but what if there was an advancement in superstring theory, one that proved undeniably that something had to have created all that we know? would you require more proof? Or would you consider current research to be wrong?